Miller v. California
712/4/1967
AI Case Brief
Generate an AI-powered case brief with:
📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance
Estimated cost: $0.001 - $0.003 per brief
Full Opinion
389 U.S. 968 88 S.Ct. 460 19 L.Ed.2d 459 Lucille MILLER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA. No. 154. Supreme Court of the United States December 4, 1967 F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent. 1 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows: 2 '1. Whether the introduction of admissions made to an undercover agent planted in petitioner's jail cell constituted a violation of petitioner's constitutional rights to counsel and against self-incrimination. 3 '2. Whether inculpatory admissions, obtained under circumstances like those here involved, can ever constitute harmless error.' 4 The case is placed on the summary calendar.
Additional Information
- source
- courtlistener_api
- subject
- constitutional-law
- import date
- 2025-12-16T14:56:30.245677
- citation count
- 2
- precedential status
- Published