Miller v. California

712/4/1967

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance

Estimated cost: $0.001 - $0.003 per brief

Full Opinion

389 U.S. 968
88 S.Ct. 460
19 L.Ed.2d 459
Lucille MILLER, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 154.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 4, 1967
F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
1
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
2
'1. Whether the introduction of admissions made to an      undercover agent planted in petitioner's jail cell      constituted a violation of petitioner's constitutional rights      to counsel and against self-incrimination.
3
'2. Whether inculpatory admissions, obtained under      circumstances like those here involved, can ever constitute      harmless error.'
4
The case is placed on the summary calendar.

Additional Information

source
courtlistener_api
subject
constitutional-law
import date
2025-12-16T14:56:30.245677
citation count
2
precedential status
Published
Miller v. California | Sage's Study Group