AI Case Brief
Generate an AI-powered case brief with:
đź“‹Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
đź“šCourt Holding
đź’ˇReasoning
🎯Significance
Estimated cost: $0.001 - $0.003 per brief
Full Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8222
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEITH DARNELL MCNEILL, a/k/a No Doubt,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (4:08-cr-00012-HCM-FBS-1)
Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Darnell McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward
Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Keith Darnell McNeill appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion
in denying the motion. See United States v. Munn, __ F.3d __,
2010 WL 546486, at *3 (4th Cir. Feb. 17, 2010) (No. 09-7525).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order for the
reasons stated there. See United States v. McNeill, No. 4:08-
cr-00012-HCM-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2009). Further, we deny
McNeill’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2