United States v. Crenshaw

76/12/1998

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance

Estimated cost: $0.001 - $0.003 per brief

Full Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                            No. 97-10692
                          Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY CRENSHAW, also known as Ant,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:96-CR-128-2-Y
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                            June 3, 1998
Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court appointed counsel for Anthony Crenshaw has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue.   Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.     See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Additional Information

source
courtlistener_api
subject
criminal-law
import date
2025-12-16T15:06:23.319554
precedential status
Unpublished