United States v. Jimmy Roberts
74/21/2010
AI Case Brief
Generate an AI-powered case brief with:
📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance
Estimated cost: $0.001 - $0.003 per brief
Full Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 21 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50090
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-cr-02433-LAB
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JIMMY LOWELL ROBERTS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 5, 2010 **
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Jimmy Lowell Roberts appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and
100-month sentence for bank robbery, in violation of
8 U.S.C. § 2113
(a). Pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967), Roberts’ counsel has filed a brief
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel
of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S.
75, 80-81
(1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
2 09-50090Additional Information
- source
- courtlistener_api
- subject
- torts
- import date
- 2025-12-16T15:07:47.882040
- precedential status
- Unpublished