Foundation of Human Understanding v. Commissioner

U.S. Tax Court5/19/1987
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance

Estimated cost: $0.001 - $0.003 per brief

Full Opinion

Foundation of Human Understanding, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Foundation of Human Understanding v. Commissioner
Docket No. 10431-83X
United States Tax Court
May 19, 1987. May 19, 1987, Filed

*75 Decision will be entered for the petitioner.

Petitioner was formed to spread the religious teachings of its founder through a broadcasting and publishing ministry. In addition to its broadcasting and publishing efforts, petitioner regularly conducts religious services at two locations where followers of petitioner's founder congregate. Petitioner requested a ruling that it was a nonprivate foundation as a church within the meaning of secs. 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i), I.R.C. 1954. Respondent determined that petitioner was a nonprivate foundation as a publicly supported organization under secs. 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), I.R.C. 1954, but that petitioner was not a church within the meaning of secs. 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i), I.R.C. 1954. Held, the Court has jurisdiction to issue a declaration of whether petitioner is a church. Sec. 7428, I.R.C. 1954, Friends of the Society of Servants of God v. Commissioner, 75 T.C. 209 (1980). Held, further, based upon all the facts and circumstances, petitioner is properly classified as a church under secs. 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i), I.R.C. 1954.

Joel R. Bryan, for the petitioner.
*76 Joan R. Domike, for the respondent.
Goffe, Judge. Sterrett, Simpson, Nims, Shields, Clapp, and Parr, JJ., agree with the majority opinion on the jurisdictional issue. Nims, Parker, Whitaker, Korner, Shields, Hamblen, Cohen, Clapp, Swift, Jacobs, Wright, and Parr, JJ., agree with the majority opinion on the substantive issue. Wells, J., concurs in the result only on the substantive issue. Gerber, J., did not participate in the consideration of this opinion. Whitaker, J., concurring. Korner and Cohen, JJ., agree with this concurring opinion. Simpson, J., dissenting in part. Sterrett, Chief Judge, agrees with this dissent. Chabot, J., dissenting. Parker, J., agrees with this dissent. Williams, J., dissenting. Hamblen, Swift, Jacobs, Wright, and Wells, JJ., agree with this dissent.

GOFFE

*1341 OPINION

In 1965, the Internal Revenue Service issued a ruling letter which recognized that petitioner is exempt from Federal income tax as an organization described *1342 in section 501(c)(3). 1 The Commissioner subsequently recognized petitioner as a nonprivate foundation because petitioner satisfied the requirements*77 of a publicly supported organization described in sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). Petitioner later requested a ruling to modify its exemption so that it would be recognized as a nonprivate foundation under section 509(a)(1) because it is a "church" within the meaning of section 170(b)(1)(A)(i). The Commissioner determined that petitioner is not a church, but this determination did not affect petitioner's exemption as a nonprivate foundation under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). Petitioner has challenged the determination of the Commissioner by invoking the jurisdiction of this Court for declaratory judgment pursuant to section 7428. The issue for decision is whether petitioner is a "church" within the meaning of section 170(b)(1)(A)(i).

This proceeding was submitted fully stipulated under Rule*78 122. Pursuant to Rule 217, the parties filed the administrative record along with a joint original and a supplemental stipulation as to its contents. 2

The Foundation of Human Understanding (petitioner) was established in 1961 by Roy Masters as the organizational vehicle whereby his doctrine concerning meditation, salvation, emotional self-control, and man's relation to God could be spread to the world. Roy Masters has summarized his beliefs, which are based upon Judeo-Christian principles, as follows: "man is a fallen being, and hence is subject to his emotions. Through meditation and faith in Christ, it is possible for man to gain control of his emotions, to become self-disciplined, and hence a disciple of Christ." In this regard, Roy Masters has developed a particular form of meditation that is used by his followers.

On January 15, 1963, Roy Masters, Ann Masters, his wife, *79 and Patrick C. Shields executed articles of association whereby petitioner became a nonprofit, unincorporated association organized for religious purposes under the laws of California. On May 27, 1963, petitioner was incorporated *1343 under the nonprofit corporation law of California. The original directors were Roy Masters, Ann Masters, and John Brill. The articles of incorporation stated that the purposes for which petitioner was formed were "the promulgation of the religious, charitable, scientific, literary and educational aspects of mind over matter and spiritual health known as psychocatalysis."

On March 31, 1964, petitioner filed Form 1023, Exemption Application, requesting recognition of exemption from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3). On December 20, 1965, the Commissioner recognized petitioner's exemption in a determination letter that characterized petitioner's purposes as religious and educational.

On August 17, 1970, petitioner filed with the IRS Form 4653, Notification Concerning Foundation Status, on which petitioner gave notice that it was not a private foundation. An organization filing Form 4653 is required to indicate the basis for its nonprivate*80 foundation status. Petitioner indicated that it was a nonprivate foundation because it was a church under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i), and "An organization that normally receives no more than 1/3 of its support from gross investment income and more than 1/3 of its support from contributions, membership fees, and gross receipts from activities related to its exempt functions * * * . Section 509(a)(2)." Despite the fact that petitioner indicated that it was a nonprivate foundation as a church under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i) and as an organization described in section 509(a)(2), IRS personnel noted on Form 4653 that petitioner was "An organization that normally receives a substantial part of its support from a Governmental unit or from the general public. Section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi)." Subsequently, by a letter dated October 20, 1970, the IRS informed petitioner that "Based on the information you recently submitted, we have classified you as an organization that is not a private foundation as defined in section 509(a) of the Internal Revenue Code." The letter did not inform petitioner that its nonprivate foundation status was based upon a determination that petitioner*81 was a publicly supported organization under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), instead of a church under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i).

*1344 On May 15, 1972, the purpose clause of the articles of incorporation of petitioner was amended to indicate that petitioner was a church. Counsel for petitioner mailed the amendment to the articles of incorporation to the District Director of Internal Revenue. Thereupon, counsel for petitioner notified petitioner that "The Foundation is now a church."

As a result of the advice of counsel, petitioner believed that all steps necessary to change the nature of its exemption to that of a church had been completed. Accordingly, petitioner did not file information returns for the years 1973 through 1978. Ultimately, representatives of the IRS informed petitioner that it was not recognized as a church and that a formal application for such recognition would be necessary. Consequently, in 1979 petitioner prepared and filed Forms 990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax, for the years 1973 through 1978 and requested a ruling that it was a church.

Although no formal application for a ruling that it qualified as a church*82 for Federal tax purposes appears in the record, the record clearly demonstrates that petitioner's request for church status was placed under consideration by the District Director. On August 14, 1979, petitioner complied with the request of the District Director for additional information upon which to base a determination of exempt status.

On September 12, 1979, petitioner again amended its articles of incorporation to include a charitable dedication provision and to amend its purposes and powers to read as follows:

(a) Purposes of the corporation:

The sole purpose for which this church is formed is the promulgation of the religious, charitable, scientific, and literary and educational aspects of the theological concepts upon which this church was founded and is organized and operated exclusively for religious purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

(b) Powers of the corporation:

The general power of this church is to engage in any activity which is in furtherance of the above-stated specific purpose.

Petitioner's application was subsequently referred to the Exempt Organizations Division of the IRS National Office. *1345 On January*83 14, 1980, Roy Masters participated in a meeting in Washington, D.C., with IRS representatives regarding petitioner's exemption application. On March 13, 1980, the Commissioner issued an adverse determination letter denying petitioner's application to have its exemption classification modified to that of a church under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i).

On February 10, 1981, petitioner commenced an action in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California seeking declaratory relief from the adverse determination of the Commissioner. By agreement with the Assistant U.S. Attorney, the Department of Justice, and the Office of the Chief Counsel of the IRS, petitioner agreed to dismiss the District Court suit without prejudice and requested a rehearing on its church status with the Exempt Organizations Division of the IRS National Office. On November 12, 1982, the Commissioner issued an adverse determination letter pursuant to the rehearing in which the Commissioner again refused to modify the nonprivate foundation status from that of a publicly supported organization described in sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) to that of a church described in sections 509(a)(1)*84 and 170(b)(1)(A)(i). Following a protest filed by petitioner, the Commissioner issued a final adverse determination letter on February 23, 1983.

At about the time petitioner was formed, Roy Masters, using his own resources, began purchasing radio air time to present a program entitled "A Moment of Truth" during which he preached concerning his doctrine. Masters also began conducting discussion and teaching groups to educate people about his doctrine and meditation technique. After petitioner was incorporated, it continued to purchase radio air time to broadcast the pre-recorded "A Moment of Truth" on various radio stations. Petitioner also began purchasing radio air time for a live show in Los Angeles hosted by Roy Masters using a call-in format whereby listeners telephone Masters with their questions, concerns, and problems, and he responds with counseling in keeping with his doctrine and teachings. At one point these radio shows, including taped replays of the live call-in show, were broadcast 5 or 6 days a week over more than a dozen stations from New England to Hawaii. The programs are *1346 also broadcast every night on Satellite Radio Network by local cable television*85 in many communities throughout the country. The estimated listening audience for these programs is approximately 2 million with a regular following of 30,000.

Petitioner has published several books and pamphlets written by Roy Masters. The following is a list of the books written by Roy Masters and published by petitioner, with the respective year of publication:

YearTitle
1964Secret of Life and Death
1970Sex, Sin and Salvation (Solution)
1975How to Control Your Emotions
1977No One Has to Die
1978How Your Mind Can Keep You Well
1979Life Itself is Hypnosis! THE SATAN PRINCIPLE -- Self
Defense Lessons to Help You Cope with Everyday
Pressure

Petitioner published the following pamphlets:

What You Should Know About Being Upset

A Guide to True Peace: The Meditations of Three Ancient Mystics, or The Excellency of Inward and Spiritual Prayer -- Part 1

A Guide to True Peace: The Meditations of Three Ancient Mystics, or The Excellency of Inward and Spiritual Prayer -- Part 2

How to Meditate Correctly

Stress and Suffering

Understanding Meditation

Petitioner also distributed the following tapes:

The Power of Words

Man & Woman Relationship Part II

Man & *86 Woman Relationship Part III

Pride the Cause of Death

Man - Woman Relations

"1683"

These tapes are, for the most part, recordings of petitioner's call-in radio show.

Petitioner publishes a magazine, "The Iconoclast," with 5,200 subscribers and an estimated readership of 15,000. Each issue features writings described as follows:

*1347 [Iconoclast writings] focus on the role that illusions, false religious images, misplaced beliefs and disintegrating institutions play in our personal and inter-personal problems. * * * Once our illusions have been destroyed, the path to true religion is revealed.

More particularly, each issue contains an article by Masters, plus features that keep readers informed of petitioner's activities, as well as materials and services offered by petitioner.

Petitioner owns and operates a building in Los Angeles, which at one time housed its headquarters. The building displays the name "Foundation of Human Understanding" along with the following quote: "Where there is no insight, the people perish." The building contains facilities to record Roy Masters' radio programs and to duplicate tapes. The building also contains a meeting hall for followers*87 of petitioner to congregate, as well as office space.

Petitioner conducts "services" at its Los Angeles building 3 or 4 times a week. These services, which are open to the public, are conducted by one of the ministers of petitioner. The conducting minister is permitted to structure the service as he chooses, ranging from highly Scriptural exhortations to practical suggestions on overcoming sin, weakness, and depression. Afterwards, followers in the congregation are allowed to and regularly do share their recent experiences concerning the Scriptures, meditation, and God. Although ministers may discuss the meditation technique prescribed by Roy Masters, meditation is performed by petitioner's followers in solitude. Ministers have performed weddings; however, the beliefs of petitioner eschew other rites such as baptism and holy communion. Although petitioner does not require its followers to disavow membership in other churches or religious organizations, many of its followers look upon petitioner as their only church.

In October 1977, petitioner opened a school for children. Although general education is provided, classwork includes religious instruction based upon the beliefs*88 of petitioner. Petitioner also operates one or more thrift stores where donated articles are sold.

In 1979, petitioner applied for authority to transact business in the State of Oregon. In the same year, *1348 petitioner purchased 373 acres of land near Selma, Oregon, and constructed basic living quarters and facilities for milling wood, ranching, farming, teaching, and conducting seminars and meetings. This property, called the Tall Timber Ranch, is operated by petitioner as a retreat and meeting facility. Although the number of people who have lived or worked at the Tall Timber Ranch has varied, approximately 50 persons were present in August 1981.

In 1982, petitioner purchased a church building, which formerly belonged to a Seventh Day Adventist congregation, in Grants Pass, Oregon. Petitioner relocated its headquarters to Grants Pass while retaining its building in Los Angeles. Petitioner encouraged its followers to relocate to Oregon and some did so. In Oregon, followers of petitioner attend services in the Grants Pass church, take part in activities at the Tall Timber Ranch, and are able to associate with other followers on a daily basis. Attendance at services *89 at both Grants Pass and Los Angeles ranges from 50 to 350 people.

In 1981, petitioner had nine ordained ministers who were employed full time. The ministers included Roy Masters, his wife, Ann Masters, and his children, David Masters, Dianne Masters, and Michael Masters. In addition, there were five ministers in training. The ministerial training process is a 3-year apprenticeship under the personal tutelage of Roy Masters.

Petitioner paid the following compensation to its officers, directors, and trustees during the years 1975 through 1980:

*2*Roy Masters*2*Robert McQuain*2*Arlyn HaunAnn Masters
YearSalaryParsonageSalaryParsonageSalaryParsonageSalary
1975$ 24,103$ 9,900$ 11,482$ 6,600$ 8,635$ 3,950$ 326
197630,35010,65012,0364,6504,680
197734,45011,65015,4505,6503,000
197839,00013,00019,5006,50013,000
197936,00012,0007,5002,50013,800
198036,00012,00013,800

Petitioner also paid the following compensation, presumably including salaries to ministers, along with parsonage allowances in the following amounts for the years 1975 through 1980: *1349

YearAmount
1975$ 26,100
197633,459
197762,562
197889,099
1979104,145
1980150,815

*90 The following table shows the total receipts reported by petitioner for the years 1971 through 1980, the amounts of contributions received, proceeds from the sale of its religious publications, and school tuition:

Sales of religiousSchool
YearTotal receiptsContributionspublicationstuition
1971$ 160,169$ 119,410$ 38,842
1972217,979147,60063,500
1973284,123182,60795,009
1974352,546244,727104,739
1975506,698315,735171,281
1976678,564366,125290,423
1977739,167482,722221,458
1978896,376638,838218,355$ 11,611
19791,064,014668,600297,96241,424
19801,217,101856,672285,079126,205

The figures given for receipts from sales of religious publications for the years 1979 and 1980 include receipts from the thrift stores operated by petitioner. For the years 1975 through 1978, thrift store receipts averaged more than $ 16,000.

During the years 1971 through 1980, contributions constituted 65.8 percent of petitioner's total receipts with the remainder derived from the sales of religious publications, school tuition, thrift store sales, interest, capital gains, and royalties. The record does not reveal what*91 percentage of the total contributions was made by followers who attended services of petitioner in Los Angeles and Grants Pass. The record also does not reveal whether tuition income for the years 1979 and 1980 in the amounts of $ 41,424 and $ 126,205, respectively, was derived solely from operating the school for children or whether those figures also include receipts from seminars and weekend retreats conducted by petitioner.

*1350 The percentage that petitioner's broadcasting expenditures bore to total expenditures for exempt purposes for the years 1975 through 1980 was as follows:

YearPercent
197546
197645
197748
197845
197948
198049

In the adverse determination letter issued on November 12, 1982, the Commissioner denied the request of petitioner to be classified as a church as follows:

In determining whether a particular organization can be considered to be a "church" within the meaning of section 170(b)(1)(A)(i) * * * the following criteria are taken into consideration: (1) a distinct legal existence; (2) a recognized creed and form of worship; (3) a definite and distinct ecclesiastical government; (4) a formal code of doctrine or discipline; (5) *92 a distinct religious history; (6) a membership not associated with any church or denomination; (7) a complete organization of ordained ministers ministering to their congregations; (8) ordained ministers selected after completing prescribed courses of study; (9) a literature of its own; (10) established places of worship; (11) regular congregations; (12) regular religious services; (13) Sunday schools for the religious instruction of the young; and (14) schools for the preparation of its ministers. These criteria are not exclusive and are not mechanically applied, but, rather, serve as a list of some of the characteristics that may be used in determining whether an organization is a church * * * any other facts and circumstances which may bear upon an organization's claim that it is entitled to church status must also be taken into consideration.

The final adverse determination letter dated February 23, 1983, holds:

The primary purpose and function of your organization are to evangelize and promulgate your teachings and doctrines through a religious broadcasting service and a religious publications operation. While you are a religious and educational organization, you are not described*93 in section 170(b)(1)(A)(i) because you are not a church as that term is commonly understood.

Petitioner has invoked our declaratory judgment jurisdiction under section 7428 to review the determination of the Commissioner that, for purposes of determining whether it is a private foundation under section 509(a)(1), petitioner does not qualify as a church within the meaning of section *1351 170(b)(1)(A)(i). Careful consideration of whether this Court has jurisdiction in this case is merited.

In 1965, petitioner received an exemption from Federal income taxes as an organization described in section 501(c)(3). Following the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1969, Pub. L. 91-172, 83 Stat. 536, which required exempt organizations to give notice if they considered themselves to be other than a private foundation, petitioner filed Form 4653 to notify the Commissioner that it was a nonprivate foundation. The reasons claimed for nonprivate foundation status were that petitioner was a church under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i) and that petitioner was an organization described in section 509(a)(2). Shortly thereafter, the Commissioner notified petitioner that it was considered*94 to be a nonprivate foundation, but he did not indicate the basis upon which nonprivate foundation status had been granted. Subsequently, petitioner twice amended its articles of incorporation to clarify its contention that it was a church, and it filed these amendments with the Commissioner.

Petitioner, believing itself to be recognized as a church, ceased filing annual information returns. See sec. 6033(a)(2)(A)(i). Petitioner did not learn that it was not recognized by the IRS as a church until after 1978. Beginning in 1979 petitioner sought a ruling that its nonprivate foundation status was based upon a determination that it was a church within the meaning of section 170(b)(1)(A)(i). Ultimately, the Commissioner, on February 23, 1983, issued a final adverse determination letter denying petitioner's request for church status under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i).

Issue 1. Jurisdiction

Section 7428 authorizes review by this Court and other courts in an actual controversy involving a determination (or the failure to make a determination) by the Commissioner with respect to the initial classification or continuing classification of an organization as (1) an organization*95 described in section 501(c)(3) or

Additional Information

Foundation of Human Understanding v. Commissioner | Law Study Group