People v. Murray

California Supreme Court7/1/1859
Citation: 14 Cal. 159
View on CourtListener

AI Case Brief

Generate an AI-powered case brief with:

📋Key Facts
⚖️Legal Issues
📚Court Holding
💡Reasoning
🎯Significance

Estimated cost: $0.001 - $0.003 per brief

Full Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.
This is the second appearance of this case. In
Mack
v.
State,
185
Ga.
415
(
195 S. E. 179
), this court reversed the judgment because of the court’s omission to instruct the jury on the law of voluntary manslaughter and of justifiable homicide. It was decided also that under the evidence a charge on the subject of conspiracy was authorized. The companion case of
Perry
v.
State,
185
Ga.
408
(
195 S. E. 175
), was again considered by this court, and in the decision rendered to-day (post, 587), we hold that there was sufficient evidence to sustain Perry’s conviction. Perry and Mack were jointly indicted for the same homicide. In the previous reports of the two cases the material portions of the testimony were set forth. The testimony in both cases was practically the same, except that it tended to show that Perry actually gave the mortal blow. There was no material difference in the proof submitted to the jury in the first trials and on their second arraignment. The evidence in the instant case was sufficient to support the verdict. The jury were authorized to find that there was a conspiracy between Perry and Mack to murder Helton, and that he died as a result of the wounds unlawfully inflicted upon him by Perry in the presence of Mack.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.

Additional Information

stub
true
citation
14 Cal. 159
citation count
2
courtlistener id
5591900
People v. Murray | Law Study Group